leadership philosophy paper 2 – exclusivewritings.com

For this Portfolio Project, write your own philosophy of leadership. Be sure to draw from your knowledge of your leadership and communication skills. Include responses to the following prompts as part of your essay:

  • My personal philosophy of leadership is…
  • The purpose of my leadership is to…
  • The best leaders can be described as…
  • For me to be an authentic leader, I need to…

Note: Feel free to use first person language in this assignment.

Remember, you must support your thinking/opinions and prior knowledge with references; all facts must be supported; in-text references used throughout the assignment must be included in an APA-formatted reference list. Include five to seven references cited in the assignment. Include at least two peer-reviewed articles as reference sources.

  • Review the grading rubric, which can be accessed through the Module 3 folder.
  • Your paper should be eight to ten pages long (This does not include the cover page, table of contents or references) and adhere to CSU-Global Writing and APA Guidelines (Links to an external site.).
  • This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Preliminary Deliverables

    50.0 to >40.0 pts

    Meets Expectation
    Delivered outline in Week 2.

    40.0 to >30.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation
    Delivered outline in Week 2 as required with a significant omission or error.

    30.0 to >20.0 pts

    Below Expectation
    Delivered outline in Week 2 as required, but with multiple omissions or errors.

    20.0 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence
    Did not deliver outline in Week 2 as required.

    50.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Requirements

    30.0 to >24.0 pts

    Meets Expectation
    The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

    24.0 to >18.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation
    The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

    18.0 to >12.0 pts

    Below Expectation
    The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

    12.0 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence
    The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

    30.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Content

    30.0 to >24.0 pts

    Meets Expectation
    Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of their leadership philosophy; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

    24.0 to >18.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation
    Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

    18.0 to >12.0 pts

    Below Expectation
    Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

    12.0 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence
    Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

    30.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Decision-Making

    30.0 to >24.0 pts

    Meets Expectation
    Demonstrates strong or adequate thought and insight in decision-making regarding their leadership philosophy.

    24.0 to >18.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation
    Some significant but not major errors or omissions in decision-making.

    18.0 to >12.0 pts

    Below Expectation
    Major errors or omissions in decision-making.

    12.0 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence
    Fails to demonstrate decision-making.

    30.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Synthesis and Evaluation

    25.0 to >20.0 pts

    Meets Expectation
    Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in authentic leadership.

    20.0 to >15.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation
    Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

    15.0 to >10.0 pts

    Below Expectation
    Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

    10.0 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence
    Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

    25.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Problem Solving

    25.0 to >20.0 pts

    Meets Expectation
    Demonstrates strong or adequate thought and insight in problem solving regarding authentic leadership and their leadership philosophy.

    20.0 to >15.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation
    Some significant but not major errors or omissions in problem solving.

    15.0 to >10.0 pts

    Below Expectation
    Major errors or omissions in problem solving.

    10.0 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence
    Fails to demonstrate problem solving.

    25.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Sources

    25.0 to >20.0 pts

    Meets Expectation
    Cites and integrates at least 5-7 credible sources.

    20.0 to >15.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation
    Cites and integrates 3-4 credible sources.

    15.0 to >10.0 pts

    Below Expectation
    Cites and integrates 1-2 credible source.

    10.0 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence
    Cites and integrates no credible sources.

    25.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Application of Source Material

    25.0 to >20.0 pts

    Meets Expectation
    Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

    20.0 to >15.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation
    Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

    15.0 to >10.0 pts

    Below Expectation
    Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

    10.0 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence
    Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

    25.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Organization

    20.0 to >16.0 pts

    Meets Expectation
    Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.

    16.0 to >12.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation
    Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.

    12.0 to >8.0 pts

    Below Expectation
    Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.

    8.0 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence
    Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.

    20.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Grammar and Style

    20.0 to >16.0 pts

    Meets Expectation
    Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

    16.0 to >12.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation
    Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

    12.0 to >8.0 pts

    Below Expectation
    Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

    8.0 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence
    Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

    20.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Demonstrates proper use of APA style.

    20.0 to >16.0 pts

    Meets Expectation
    Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error.

    16.0 to >12.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation
    Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors.

    12.0 to >8.0 pts

    Below Expectation
    Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors.

    8.0 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence
    Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors.

    20.0 pts
    Total Points:
    300.0

ORDER NOW